🔗 Share this article

Over the weekend, Battlefield Studios introduced a new game mode called Casual Breakthrough. To put it simply, this mode resembles the standard Breakthrough setup but includes several notable changes:

• Each team includes only eight human participants, with the rest made up of AI-controlled opponents.
• Activities performed by real players award full XP, while AI activities offer lower rewards.
• Only two locations can be played: Siege of Cairo and Empire State.
• Elements like Dogtags, accolades, and career stat updates have been turned off.

So essentially, the playlist lives up to its name: it's a casual version of Breakthrough. On the surface, one could assume it's a good idea, as it provides more options for gamers seeking different methods to have fun with the game. But, gaming history has shown one thing, it's that you can't please everyone. In other words, many Battlefield 6 players are upset.

Community Responses: From Fury to Support

"Gamers prefer human opponents. Avoid making the errors of your competitors," states a response to the official announcement. "Truly disappointing concept," says another. At the same time, on the Battlefield subreddit, a player remarks, "It's unclear where we are going with this title," while another lists all the issues they believe to be broken in the game: "Resolve glitches, address drone issues, correct rocket mechanics, fix [the] bloom after sprinting bug, improve hit detection. We don't need this bot mode."

On the other hand, amid the criticism, some gamers explaining how much they're liking the recent addition. "It's enjoyable to warm up, human participants keep it from being a complete grind but it's very relaxed," reads a forum post. "The community doesn't understand that there are players who have lives and don't play this title all the time. Let them find a middle ground," adds another. A response via social media clarifies that as they're "a parent gamer with busy schedules, this is great for me," while someone else applauds the mode for "not being overcompetitive."

Valid Concerns and Community Input

All that said, players have valid points to complain about the new mode. Some users have highlighted that it could increase queue times more extended for different playlists due to the large amount of options in the game already. Similarly, certain regions already encounter mostly bots in the existing playlists. Additionally, it appears somewhat counterintuitive that the mode won't start without a minimum number of real players, despite it focuses mostly on combat against bots.

Finally, one of the biggest grievances is that Battlefield Portal was meant to offer full XP, even against bots, but that got canned when they attempted to remove bot farms from the mode. Thus this new playlist seems like the community compromising in the middle, as per forum feedback. A different user describes this mode as the developers "dropping the ball significantly, I experienced great enjoyment in the initial release, why did they feel the need to adjust it?"

Future Prospects: Adjustments Occur?

Should the development team has proven anything so far with the latest installment, it is that they're listening and responding to player input. Assignments that were overly hard were adjusted very quickly, as did the specific battle pass objectives. Chances are that, if their data shows this new playlist is underperforming to their expectations, they won't be shy to change it again.